Status: Resolutions/Motions Passed
Academic Year(s): 2018-2019
Committee(s): Administration and Budget (CAB)
Documents
Updates
Presented to the Mト]oa Faculty Senate by the Committee on Administration and Budget (CAB) for a vote of the full Senate on February 20, 2019, a resolution opposing phase I of the reorganization of Mト]oa management structure.フ Approved by the Mト]oa Faculty Senate on February 20, 2019 with 38 votes in support of opposing; 5 votes against; and 3 abstentions.
Resolution Opposing Phase I of the Reorganization of Mト]oa Management Structure
WHEREAS, the Mト]oa Senate has been asked to evaluate and provide a recommendation on the Phase I Reorganization of Mト]oa窶冱 Management structure dealing with the combining of the President of the System and Mト]oa Chancellor窶冱 positions and the creation of a Mト]oa Provost position, and;
WHEREAS, the entire reorganization proposal was not available for review, including Phase II that will focus on realigning and renaming current Vice Chancellor positions that serve Mト]oa窶冱 Instructional, Research, and Community Service missions, and;
WHEREAS, the Phase I document is ambiguously written, unevenly edited, and poorly assembled in regards to the focus of the reorganization and the duties of positions described, and;
WHEREAS, the prime justification for this reorganization is that separate positions with the Chancellor of Mト]oa reporting to President of the ツ鮓ケエォテスSystem has not operated effectively and that previous joint President/Chancellor positions were perceived as more effective, and;
WHEREAS, the reasons for the ineffectiveness of the separate Chancellor and President management structure is not provided in the Phase I document and no explanation or evidence is provided as to how a President/ Mト]oa CEO and Provost structure will not lead to similar management issues, and;
WHEREAS, the Phase I document does not state how the success or failure of the proposed reorganization will be empirically measured and assessed, and;
WHEREAS, the Phase I document does not detail how the proposed reorganization aligns with Mト]oa窶冱 nor the System窶冱 ツ鮓ケエォテス, nor the proposed Draft Mト]oa ツ鮓ケエォテス, and;
WHEREAS, the Provost窶冱 proposed Functional Statement states that the Provost has 窶廡ull budget authority for all academic units窶, however, the new structure does not preclude the possibility that units may circumvent the Provost and seek a more favorable hearing from the President/Mト]oa CEO, and;
WHEREAS, the Phase I document states that the Provost has full budget authority for all academic units at Mト]oa but the Mト]oa Office of Business and Finance reports directly to the President and therefore the Provost does not have full control over fiscal matters at Mト]oa, and;
WHEREAS, the Phase I document does not address the recommendation made in the 2015 Longanecker and Michelau report to the ツ鮓ケエォテスBOR that the President and Chancellor positions remain separate and that the roles and responsibilities of system and campus staff be understood, and that all actors must be disciplined with transparency in decision making, and have clear communication, and;
WHEREAS, on February 21, 2018, the Mト]oa Faculty Senate voted that they view with interest the idea of recombining the System President and Mト]oa Chancellor Positions (32 votes in support of approval; 7 against approval; and 3 abstentions) and that the faculty窶冱 position remains unchanged, and;
WHEREAS, the Mト]oa Faculty Senate requested for the Reorganization Proposal to be delivered in parts as they are completed with the Faculty窶冱 understanding that a judgment regarding the proposed reorganization would not be provided until all materials had been received, and;
WHEREAS, the Board of Regents is moving the proposed reorganization forward precipitously and expediently in spite of the fact that the administration has not provided sufficient time for faculty review and consideration;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mト]oa Faculty Senate is Opposed to the Phase I Reorganization of the management structure of ツ鮓ケエォテスMト]oa, that focuses on the recombination of the President/Chancellor positions and the creation of a Provost;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mト]oa Faculty Senate reserves the right to endorse or oppose the reorganization in its entirety after all phases of the proposal have been received, evaluated, and considered.
Supporting documents:
University of Hawaii at Mト]oa Reorganization Proposal – Phase I []
Addendum: Proposed Office of the President and Office of the Provost Functional Statements []
フ